全部主张 / 《永乐大典》、科学与侵华时间线
牛顿在1666年发明微积分
判定边界
双方证据链未闭合（本轮），不是双方等真，也不是给视频主张背书。
视频原话摘要
他1666年发明微积分
- 领域
- mathematics_history
- 涉及对象
- 牛顿；微积分
- 声称年代
- 1666
- 话语角色
- 作者主张
双轨条件矩阵
H_VIDEO 与 H_MAIN 独立列出必要条件、正向预测、反证条件、替代机制、形成链和协调伪造规模。
| 模型 | 条件类型 | 条件 | 评估 | 关联证据 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H_VIDEO | necessary_condition | 需 distinguish discovery, manuscript, first systematic tract, publication and priority dispute | mixed | |
| H_VIDEO | positive_prediction | Newton Project documents 1665-1666 notebooks and October 1666 tract on fluxions and inverse operations | mixed | |
| H_VIDEO | disconfirmer | source assigns all invention to a different year/person or shows 1666 claim is only later dating | input_limited | |
| H_VIDEO | alternative_mechanism | Leibniz, Descartes, Wallis, Barrow and prior methods form cumulative development | input_limited | |
| H_VIDEO | formation_chain | 1664/65 reading and notebooks→1666 tract→1669 circulation→1711 print | mixed | |
| H_VIDEO | fabrication_or_coordination_scope | not_required_by_claim_logic | not_applicable_by_claim_logic | |
| H_MAINSTREAM | necessary_condition | Newton calculus claim needs dated manuscript evidence and separate invention, priority and publication questions | input_limited | |
| H_MAINSTREAM | positive_prediction | Newton Project records 1664-1666 notebooks and the October 1666 fluxions tract | input_limited | |
| H_MAINSTREAM | disconfirmer | Leibniz's parallel work and later publication/priority dispute qualify the word 'invented' as a sole, simple event | input_limited | |
| H_MAINSTREAM | alternative_mechanism | independent chronology, local development and intermediary transmission can explain the scientific record without the proposed model | input_limited | |
| H_MAINSTREAM | formation_chain | Wallis/Barrow reading→Newton notebooks and 1666 tract→later circulation/publication→priority dispute | input_limited | |
| H_MAINSTREAM | fabrication_or_coordination_scope | not_required_by_claim_logic | not_applicable_by_claim_logic |
推理桥梁
H_VIDEOothermixed
1666 is a development milestone, not proof of an eastern source
H_MAINSTREAMotherinput_limited
a Newton manuscript is not evidence that a Yongle passage supplied calculus
审计字段与说明
- 终态方法
- dual_track_evidence
- 音频核验
- two_asr_surface_agreement
- 研究备注
- 冻结命题与矩阵终态逐 ID 对齐；非事实 lane 不转写为历史胜负。