全部主张 / 《永乐大典》、科学与侵华时间线
《永乐大典》早于牛顿记载了微积分雏形
判定边界
双方证据链未闭合（本轮），不是双方等真，也不是给视频主张背书。
用户档位：未映射
当日视频这一批命题的台账里没有“证据方向”和“证据强度”两列，而用户档位正是由这两列推出来的。两条轴之间不存在函数关系，硬套就是发明数据，所以本站不给这一批命题标档位。
要给它一个档位，需要按同一套规则对它独立重判：写出正向证据、反证、已查检索面和判定稳度。这条动作还没有做。
另两批命题为什么有档位、这套档位怎么定的，见方法与边界。
视频原话摘要
永乐大典早有微积分的雏形
- 领域
- mathematics_history
- 涉及对象
- 《永乐大典》；微积分
- 声称年代
- 永乐年间；早于1666
- 话语角色
- 作者主张
证据连接
来源记录
SRCREF:R005-HMAIN-F3:SRC-CTEXT-MATHSRCREF:R005-HMAIN-F3:SRC-CTEXT-YONGLESRCREF:R005-HMAIN-F3:SRC-LOC-COLLSRCREF:R005-HMAIN-F3:SRC-NEWTON-CALC-TRACTSRCREF:R005-HMAIN-F3:SRC-SOAS-MATHSRCREF:R005-HVIDEO-F3:S001SRCREF:R005-HVIDEO-F3:S004SRCREF:R005-HVIDEO-F3:S025SRCREF:R005-HVIDEO-F3:S026
待解问题
RESREF:R005-HMAIN-F3:RES-26RESREF:R005-HVIDEO-F3:RES-F3-S06-C08-01RESREF:R005-HVIDEO-F3:RES-F3-S06-C08-02
报告锚点：S05.3 · 研究专题线：F3_YONGLE_SCIENCE_INVASION
双轨条件矩阵
H_VIDEO 与 H_MAIN 独立列出必要条件、正向预测、反证条件、替代机制、形成链和协调伪造规模。
| 模型 | 条件类型 | 条件 | 评估 | 关联证据 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H_VIDEO | necessary_condition | 需 locate a named Yongle juan/object and define mathematical equivalence to differential/integral calculus | mixed | |
| H_VIDEO | positive_prediction | surviving or reconstructed juan contains a dated, technically comparable precursor and transmission record | mixed | |
| H_VIDEO | disconfirmer | catalogues show broad scope but no named calculus passage/object; Chinese mathematics sources do not identify Yongle as the source | input_limited | |
| H_VIDEO | alternative_mechanism | earlier Chinese algorithmic algebra, astronomy and mathematical texts may be genuine alternatives without being calculus or Yongle evidence | input_limited | |
| H_VIDEO | formation_chain | Chinese mathematical traditions→Yongle quotation/copy→reader/transmitter→Newton | mixed | |
| H_VIDEO | fabrication_or_coordination_scope | not_required_by_claim_logic | not_applicable_by_claim_logic | |
| H_MAINSTREAM | necessary_condition | the Yongle-calculus model requires a named surviving passage, object identifier, mathematical interpretation and a transmission route to Newton | input_limited | |
| H_MAINSTREAM | positive_prediction | retrieved sources show early Chinese mathematical texts preserved or excerpted in the compendium, but no specific calculus passage or Newton route | input_limited | |
| H_MAINSTREAM | disconfirmer | Newton's dated 1666 fluxions documents and late-Qing explicit calculus translation provide counter-chronology to an unanchored Yongle claim | input_limited | |
| H_MAINSTREAM | alternative_mechanism | independent chronology, local development and intermediary transmission can explain the scientific record without the proposed model | input_limited | |
| H_MAINSTREAM | formation_chain | earlier Chinese arithmetic/geometry→Yongle quotation/compilation→possible later reception would require an identified object and reader | input_limited | |
| H_MAINSTREAM | fabrication_or_coordination_scope | not_required_by_claim_logic | not_applicable_by_claim_logic |
推理桥梁
H_VIDEOothermixed
no named object and no reading/transmission bridge found
H_MAINSTREAMotherinput_limited
similar mathematical techniques or a broad encyclopedia entry do not prove calculus transmission to Newton
审计字段与说明
- 终态方法
- dual_track_evidence
- 音频核验
- two_asr_surface_agreement
- 研究备注
- 冻结命题与矩阵终态逐 ID 对齐；非事实 lane 不转写为历史胜负。